Ḥorvat Hanot - Monastery (?)

Vertical tabs

Source of knowledge
Epigraphy
Archaeological remains
Excavated site
Excavators: 
NameDate
Shenhav
1985
Discussion: 
The inscription found at the site mentions "Theodore, priest and hegumen". The title of "hegumen" immediately raises the possibility of the site having been a monastery. Di Segni argues that this was not a monastery proper but a road station providing services for pilgrims (Di Segni 2003: 275; 2016: 186*). Two excavation seasons in 2015-16 further revealed the sophisticated winepress, the burial chamber beneath the chapel and other structures. These revelations lend support to the identification of Ḥorvat Ḥanot as a monastery rather than just a road station, as proposed by Di Segni.
State of certainty: 
Uncertain / Questionable
Architectural evolution
General outline: 
Only part of the nave was excavated. The foundation date of the structure is not known but as it served the many pilgrims that travelled in the Holy Land it most likely was first constructed sometime in the sixth century.
Dating material: 

Suggested

Phase date
Century: 
6th c.
General outline: 
Sometime in the late sixth or early seventh century the church was modified and redecorated as is described in the inscription: an apse, murals, marble facing on the end wall of the presbytery, and a diakonikon were added and a new mosaic pavement was laid. The possible dates provided by the inscription are 563/4, 578/9, 593/4 or 608/9. According to Di Segni (2003: 275), the preferred dates are April 594 or April 609 CE.
Dating material: 

Epigraphic

Phase date
Century: 
6th c.
Within century: 
Late
General outline: 
The site was abandoned sometime in the first half of the eighth century.
Dating material: 

The mosaic pavement showed signs of iconoclasm and mending. It was abandoned before the great earthquake of 749 CE as hardly any finds of the Early Islamic period were recovered.

Phase date
Century: 
8th c.
Within century: 
First half
Iconoclastic evidence
Iconoclastic evidence: 
Yes
Iconoclastic evidence comments: 
Repair of the defaced animal images was by reinsertion of the scrambled tesserae
Post Arab conquest history: 
Still in use
Post conquest history comments: 
The structure was occupied in later periods. The mosaic pavement showed signs of fire having been lit on it, probably by travelers. In the Middle Ages the site served as a Khan, rooms were built with blocks in secondary use. The site was abandoned in the late Middle Ages and used by shepherds.