Nessana - SS. Sergius and Bacchus (North Church monastery)

Vertical tabs

Source of knowledge
Literary sources
Epigraphy
Archaeological remains
Surveyed site
Surveyors: 
NameDate
Palmer
1871
wooley and Lawrence
1914-1915
Excavated site
Excavators: 
NameDate
Colt
1935-1936
History: 
The site, located north of the fort on the acropolis of Nessana, served originally only as a church. According to the excavators, the graffiti naming St. Sergius, a popular soldier-saint, might indicated that it was constructed for the use of the garrison. In its first phase, the church is dated to the mid fifth century CE. It is not clear when the location became a monastery, nor did the excavators identify it as such, but the church was expanded several times and the complex around it was expanded in the sixth century. It may be assumed that this was the time of the establishment of the monastery. Based on Umayyad coins found in the complex it continued to function into the Early Islamic period.
Discussion: 
It is noteworthy that the Colt expedition did not at any point regard the complex as a monastery. Its monastic identification can be deduced from the plan but more explicitly from an inscribed, dated tombstone mentioning "Sergius son of Paticius priest and hegumen..." located in the east end of the north aisle of the church, and a second, mentioning Paticius son of Sergius, also a priest and hegumen (Colt 1962: 140; Di Segni 1997, no. 305). Although there is a long list of small finds from the excavations at Nizzana, the exact provenance of the separate items was not mentioned in the publication (Colt 1962, vol. I).
State of certainty: 
Archaeologicaly definitive
Architectural evolution
Phase name (as published): 
The first series of additions
General outline: 
The church and burial chambers apparently pre-existed the monastery, constructed in the mid fifth century, based on an inscription on a tomb. The inscription only mentions a priest "...Thomas, priest of this holy martyrium..." indicating that it was not a monastery at this point in time. In what may have been the first phase of the monastery, the small chapel north of the church, a baptistery and three rooms were constructed. The roof of the church had originally been covered, like other rooms in the complex with stone slabs. In this phase, the floor of the church was raised and the roof was changed to timber. The church was apparently enlarged, cancelling out the narthex. The rooms south of the church were constructed on fill held by a retaining wall.
Dating material: 

Based on an abacus inscribed with the date 601, found in the baptistery and apparently belonging to this phase, the establishement of the monastery can be dated to the begining of the seventh century CE.

Phase date
Century: 
7th c.
Within century: 
Early
Iconoclastic evidence
Iconoclastic evidence: 
No
Phase name (as published): 
The second series of additions
General outline: 
The size of the complex was nearly doubled. Rooms, the northern courtyard and two staircases were added. According to the excavators, there was no second story and the stairs led to open galleries on the roof. The construction of this phase was far superior to the earlier phases. The stone used in this construction was a hard limestone well dressed. East of the church, some rooms including a large hall and a courtyard were constructed and supported by massive retaining walls over the steep slope. The eastern courtyard contained a large cistern. Sometime later a deep well was dug in the northern part of the complex and strong retaining walls added.
Dating material: 

A limestone slab with an inscription mentioning the architect, son of Victor and others involved in the construction. The inscription marks the end of the construction and was dated to 605 CE (Colt 1962: 165)

Phase date
Century: 
7th c.
Dating material: 

Based on papyri dated to 687-689

Phase date
Century: 
7th c.
Within century: 
Late
Post Arab conquest history: 
Still in use