At-Taiyibe (Apharaema/Ephraim) - El-Khadr
Church Name, type, function
Location
Source of knowledge
Archaeological remains
Name | Date |
---|---|
Guerin | 1860s |
Peters | 1904 |
A.M. Schneider | 1930/31 |
Bagatti | 1970s |
Finkelstein, Lederman and Bunimovitz | 1990s |
Name | Date |
---|---|
Vincent Michel | 2000-2009 |
39-44 | |
214-216 (no. 93) | |
166-167 |
General description
Description
No atrium. A monumental staicase, 1.9m high, lead from the west to the narthex.
Open to the west by four columns. Along the western front of the basilica. Mosaic paved. In phase 2 it was extended southward, to serve the annexed chapel, and an openning was installed in its northern wall, leading to the baptistery.
A wide entrance led to the nave; a narrower one to the southern aisle. The northern aisle had no entrance due to the hypogeum underlying the western end of this aisle.
Thickness of walls: 0.90 m. approx.
The nave was separated from the aisles by two rows of 5 columns with lotus-shaped capitals.
Dead-end aisles. An opening near the eastern end of the southern aisle led to the annexed sacristy. A stone lintel with a tabula ansata was found in situ over the entrance to the southern aisle. Segments of colored mosaics were found in the southern corner of the southern aisle.
The northern aisle had no entrance due to the hypogeum underlying the western end of this aisle (Schneider 1931a: 20, Fig.7). These seems to had served a burial crypt. Remains of numerous skeletons and many oil lamps of various periods were found therein.
The hemispherical apse was protruding outside as a poligonal structure. The lower four courses of the apse are built of hard limestone. According to Michel's reconstruction a synthronon was built against the apse and an ambo projected from the NW corner of the sanctuary already in this early phase (II.1), attributed to the late 5th - early 6th c. The bema, U-shaped, had a single opening in the center of the chancel screen.
According to Michel (2015), the two aisles terminated on the east in a dead-end.
Small finds
Category | Description |
---|---|
Pottery | In the burial cave near the church votive lamps were found |
Detailed description
Structure
Total |
---|
5 |
Lateral Apses Function
Crypt
Cult of relics
Burial loci
Baptism
Attached structures
Architectural Evolution
Phase name (as published) | General outline | Dating material | Phase no. | Century | Within century |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
II.1 | A mono-apsidal basilical dead-end aisles, a narthex, a simple sacristy attached on the SE. All components were mosaic paved but only small segments are extant.
According to Michel's reconstruction, a synthronon was built against the apse and an ambo projected from the NW corner of the sanctuary already in this early phase. The bema, U-shaped, had a single opening in the center of the chancel screen. An earlier hypogeum with six stairs leading in was found under the western end of the the northern aisle (Schneider 1931a: 20, Fig.7). These seems to had served a burial crypt. Remains of numerous skeletons and many oil lamps of various periods were found therein. | The French expedition (Michel 2015) dated the first phase to the late 5th-early 6th century on the basis of pottery reading. | Phase 1 | 5th-6th c. | |
II.2 | In this phase the basilica was enlarged and some mosaics renewed. The southern sacristy was replaced by an apsidal chapel accessed from near the eastern end of the aisle. Its main entrance was from the narthex which was extended to the south to meet this addition. A four-units structure was annexed on the north. The westernmost unit, rectangular and longer than the other three, was accessed through an opening in the northern wall of the narthex. This unit was mosaic-paved and had a water cistern underneath. Michel suggests that it served as a baptistery; the the extant quadrilobite in a circle font (Ben-Pechat type 9a) was standing near its eastern wall. The two western units, square in shape, had a-liturgical functions according to Michel. | Pottery reading and mosaics style. | Phase 2 | 6th c. | First half |
II.3 | This phase is recognized by several modifications in the northern annex, including the installation of a bench. | Phase 3 | 7th-8th c. | ||
The church was destroyed by a sever fire, caused perhaps by an earthquake. | The Early Christian / Byzantine church was replaced by a triconch Crusaders church. | Abandonment | 8th c. | Mid |
The medieval church occupies the central part of an earlier Byzantine complex, and its remains are in turn partly enclosed by still later constructions. This situation caused difficulties in understanding of the plan of the original Early Christian church. These dificulties were resolved by a meticolous survey and excavations by Michel and his team (2000-2009). Hence, earlier publications (Ovadiah's 1970: 66-67; Magen and Kagan 2012: 214-216; and even Ann Michel 2019, 166-167), according to which the Early Christian church had a triconche church-head should be dismissed. Pringle (1998: 339-344), rightly associates the triconche component with the Mediaeval church.