Khirbet ed Deir - Church
Church Name, type, function
Location
Source of knowledge
Archaeological remains
Name | Date |
---|---|
Conder and Kitchener | 1871-1877 |
Marcoff and Chitty | 1928 |
Name | Date |
---|---|
Hirschfeld | 1982-1983 |
General description
Description
The entrance to the cave church was in the center of the southern wall that closed the mouth of the cave. It was 1 m wide, but no threshold or jambs were revealed, so probably, the door was made from wood.
The rock walls of the cave were partially lined with masonry and plastered. The southern wall that closed the mouth of the cave was well built and had a window at the top to allow light into the cave (W36). The walls of the gatehouse (W22; W32, W33; W34, W35) were built of two faces of ashlars on hewn rock foundation. They were rather thick - 0.9 m. Their inner side was covered with 2 layers of plaster, each 1 cm thick. The natural rock walls of the cave were also covered with plaster, 0.2-0.8 m thick, depending on the relief of the surface. Sometimes the plaster was added with the layer of fieldstones (the northern rock hewn wall W39).
The prayer hall was rectangular (9 x 11 m). The space was formed by construction of walls that partitioned the prayer hall from the auxiliary spaces within the cave. The floor of the prayer hall was paved with a mosaic of fine workmanship and a Greek inscription within a tabula ansata. Two other mosaic carpets are located on the southern part of the hall, the most intricate and colorful one is in front of the reliquary niche.
The apse is square, it had been evened out by hewing. Two niches were cut into the back wall for liturgical use. One of the niche was located on the eastern wall of the southern wing. It was semicircular, 1.1 m in diameter, 1.8 m high. The other one, smaller, was located on the eastern wall of the main church altar space. It was oval, 0.4 m wide, 0.6 m high, 0.4 m deep; the base was 1.45 m from the floor. The bema (5 x 7 m) was raised and surrounded with a chancel screen of marble. The stylobate on which the screen stood remained in situ. A fragment of greenish marble chancel screen panel was found prior to the excavation. The main entrance to the bema, 1 m wide, is on the west with a second entry on the south. The floor of the bema was paved with a floral-patterned mosaic. On the northern wall of the church (W39) there were two other ancillary niches. The western niche was 0.6 m above the floor (0.95 m wide, 0.75 m deep; ca. 1.25 m high (damaged); Fig. 62). The eastern niche (near the chancel screen, prothesis side) was relatively small: it measured 0.7x0.9 m, 0.4 m high. Probably, it was used for keeping liturgical objects.
West of the prayer hall there are three auxiliary rooms: a central chamber and two smaller ones. The central of the three, measuring 4.5 x 8.8 m, probably served as a diakonikon. The three rooms were also paved with mosaics over which the rock ceiling had collapsed with time. The northernmost of these rooms was partially excavated (measured 2.2x3.4 m; W39, W43). The westernmost room (measured 5.5x2.2/4.4 m) was located in the depth of the cave. Probably, it was a cell, occupied by priest or a monk responsible for the services or other responsibilities, as lighting of the lamps, for the example.
Small finds
Detailed description
Structure
Cult of relics
Baptism
Attached structures
Architectural Evolution
General outline | Dating material | Iconoclastic evidence | Phase no. | Century | Within century |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The foundation of the monastery is dated to the late fifth or early sixth century. During this period the church and the chapel were built | Based on the style of the mosaics in comparison with those at Martyrius and Masada. Other dating material: coins, church furnishings, glass, and pottery are gerenally dated to the Byzantine period. | Phase 1 | 5th c. | Late | |
At some stage, perhaps in the sixth century, the ceiling of the cave collapsed, possibly as a result of an earthquake and some of the spaces went out of use. The further rebuilding considerably changed the planning of the ecclesiatical complex. | Phase 2 | 6th c. | |||
The monastery was abandoned in an orderly fashion sometime in the Early Islamic period. | The pottery assemblage and paucity of finds. | Abandonment | 7th c? |