Caesarea - Octagonal Church
Church Name, type, function
Location
Source of knowledge
Archaeological remains
Name | Date |
---|---|
Combined Caesarea Expedition | 1989-1992, 1995-2000,2002 |
General description
Description
The walls were built of local kurkar stones, were mostly preserved in the foundations, below floors level (except on the east). Holes for attaching marble plates can be seen in some places on both sides of some walls. Secondary use of stones and elements from the temple can be seen in the foundations.
Octagonal with an inner diameter of 20 m. andexternal diameter of about 22 m. Remains of a 2X2 masonry built pit marks the location of the proposed reliquary of the martyr, that was reveted by green chipollino marble plates, only bits of which were uncovered. The wall supported piers and columns that separated the inner space from the ambulatory.
Inner diameter of 37.5 m; 39 m. including the walls thickness.
At the beginning (ca. 500 CE), built as an octagonal martyrion with no apse. This was added shortly thereafter, perhaps a decade or two later (Holum 2021: 230-236), being built over the marble pavement of the eastern side of the ambulatory, occupying its entire breadth. The bema was raised two steps, each 15cm high, and canceled the columns that earlier separated between the center and ambulatory.
Small finds
Detailed description
Structure
Cult of relics
Architectural Evolution
General outline | Dating material | Phase no. | Century | Within century |
---|---|---|---|---|
An octagonal structure without an apse or a bema, serving as a martyrion. A pit holding a reliquary, was uncovered in the geometric center. See General description. Few fragments of green (cipollino) marble suggest that the reliquary might have been reveted by such marble plates. | The excavators dated the church to about 500 CE, based on pottery and coins (Magness, in Vann, 1992; Lampinen in Vann, 1992 and Holum, 2008). Lampinen mentions that there is a lack of coins from the 6th century on the platform. Shalev (1999) believes that the probe under the floor cannot be used to date the church only due to the occurance of late sherds, and therefore she prefers dating the church to the second half- end of the 5th century, before 491, since it is not mentioned as part of the restoration works of the harbor under Anastasius (491-518). | Phase 1 | 5th c. | Late |
After a short time - perhaps just 10 years, a bema was built in the eastern part of the ambulatory, over the marble floor. The bema was elevated two stairs above the inner octagon to its west. A circular base stone of an ambo was uncovered, but no remains of an altar. The two columns of the inner ring that previously separated the inner octagon from the ambulatory were removed. | Phase 2 | 6th c. | Early | |
The finds indicate destruction by the 749 earthquake. | The bathhouse located to the south west has an Umayyad phase covered by a layer of destruction belonging to the earthquake of 749. | Abandonment | 8th c. | Mid |