16159 - Deir Hajla (Monastery of Gerasimus) - Upper Church

Export to text file
Save as pdf (ctrl P )

Deir Hajla (Monastery of Gerasimus) - Upper Church

Church Name, type, function

Site Name: 
Deir Hajla (Monastery of Gerasimus)
Identification: 
See under Lower Church
Church name: 
Upper Church
Functional Type: 
Monastic
Dedication: 
unknown
Church type: 
Basilical

Location

Coordinates, ITM system: 
24,760.00
63,644.00
Coordinates, ICS system: 
19,759.00
113,640.00
Geographical region: 
Southern Jordan Valley
Topographical location: 
on the plain
Distance from nearest bishop-seat: 
ca. 25 km east - northeast of Jerusalem.
Distance from nearest settlement: 
ca. 5 km southeast of Jericho.
Distance from Roman roads: 
ca. 2 km south from the road connecting Jericho, Nevo and Amman
Provincial affiliation: 
Palaestina I
Bishopric: 
Regio Jericho

Source of knowledge

Literary sources: 
Literary sources
Epigraphy: 
Epigraphy

Archaeological remains

Surveyed site
Surveyors: 
NameDate
Conder, Kitchener
1871-1877
Guérin
1874-1875
Κοικυλίδου
1900
Féderlin
1903
Schneider
1933
Augustinović
1950
Bar Adon
1967-1968
Hirschfeld
1987
History: 
See under Identification. A group of ten monks are attested in the Commemoratorium occupying it in the early ninth century.

General description

State of preservation/which parts were uncovered: 
The modern monastery was built in the 12th century CE and restored in the 19th on the remains of the Byzantine complex, the masonry of which is still traceable at the southern and eastern monastic walls. There are the remains of the three aisled basilica (12x24.50 m) or cross-domed church with the semicircular apse between lateral pastophoria and narthex on the western side on the second floor. The cruciform plan might appear during the Middle Byzantine period (the piers and coordinated with them pilasters might be of the same period), when it was mostly popular, with the use of the initial building of the traditional Byzantine basilica. A.M. Schneider supposed, that instead of the Medieval narthex, there was one more bay of the colonnaded basilica (Schneider 1938: 41-3), as in the monastic church of St. Euthimius. The eastern part seems to be close to original or even original. In the northern aisle there are partially preserved Byzantine mosaics. Also there are the remains of the church on the first floor, not so well preserved, but also with three aisles (3 piers in each row) and eastern compartment (the apse and pastophoria were not preserved). Its northern rectangular unit was decorated with the geometric mosaic.  There are two plans of the church available so far. One of them was presented by Conder and Kitchener and it takes into consideration the remains of all periods without differentiation. Schneider had published the remains of the Byzantine upper and lower churches and their anticipated reconstructions according to the architectural and mosaic remains. The architectural details, exhibiting in front of the modern monastery, were never published. Their provenance is not clear, as well as we don't know when they had appeared at the spot, but most probably, the members (both Byzantine and Medieval) were derived from the original monastic building and will be described further in the proper section.    

Description

Illustrative material: 
Atrium: 

The church was abutting to the northern wall of the monastic complex, so the rest area of it might be used as atrium.

Narthex: 

Rectangular unit to the west from the domus, measured ca. 5x12 m. Originally probably it was one more bay of the colonnaded basilica. 

Façade and entries: 

According to the reconstruction of Schneider, there were one entrance from southern side of narthex and three entrances from narthex to domus, leading into each of the aisles.

Lateral walls: 

The remains of the earlier masonry might be seen on the northern and eastern walls of the complex, as well as in the construction of the south-east butress. The large elaborated stones were used, some of them just smoothened, others have drafted margins and protruding bosses. The sizes of them are not regular.  

Nave: 

The width of the nave was 4.22 m, the length was 13.5 m.

Aisles: 

The width of the aisles was 2.80 m, the length was 13.5 m.

Bema, chancel screen and apse: 

The apse was of the semicircular shape, with piers attached to its shoulders (probably, later adition). No traces of the early bema.   

Small finds

Detailed description

Structure

Orientation: 
Facing east
Materials applied (walls): 
Limestone
Water cistern: 
Yes
Narthex: 
Yes
Aisles: 
2
Colonnades / Arcades: 
Arcade of pillars
Number of nave columns in a row: 
Total Extant in N Extant in S
4
2
2
Capital types: 
Ionic
Composite
Basket
Corinthian
East end: 
Internal apse
Church Head/Chevet: 
dead end aisles (mon-aps III)
Central Apse Category: 
apsidal
Altar remains: 
legs

Pastophoria

Pastophoria loci: 
N & S
Description and function of northern: 
The apse was flanked with square pastophoria, formed from the eastern dead-ends of aisles and tapered passages into them with pilasters and piers. Behind the apse there was a narrow passageway, that originally connected the pastophoria.

Cult of relics

Cult of relics loci: 
elsewhere
Reliquiaries: shapes and contents: 
Remains of martyrs massacred by Persians in 614 are venerated in the monastery. The tomb of St. Gerasimus is said to be somewhere in the desert; lost.

Architectural Evolution

Phase name (as published)General outlineDating materialIconoclastic evidencePhase no.CenturyWithin century
Byzantine
The monastery was founded by Gerasimus around 455 CE.

Literary (see Literary Sources).

Phase 1
5th c.
Mid
Probably, during the Persian invasion (according to local tradition)
Undetermined
Abandonment
7th c.
First half
Post conquest history comments: 
The monastery probably was deserted after the Persian invasion in 614 (Hoade 1984: 493). The commemoratorium de casis Dei (808) mentions ten monks at the site. It is, however, not known when these monks settled at the site and whether the monastery had been abandoned at some earlier time and then resettled. According to Pringle (Pringle 1993: 197), the monastery was had been occupied from its foundation till the 12th century CE without the break (Vailhe 1899: 122-16, Augustinovic 1951: 108). It was restored in 1185, according to the bilingual inscription from the monastery. Likewise, it is not known when this later group of monks abandoned the site. In the late 19th-early 20th century it was rebuilt once again, but only at the spot of the monastic church, the coenobium wasn't renewed.