Vertical tabs
Replaced the Constantinian church. Still in use. A trifoil transept basilica comprising of an atrium, a narthex, a nave flanked by two aises on either side, and a trefoil church-head set above the Nativity Cave. 53.2X26.8 m. in diemensions (Ovadiah 1970).
Due to the extention of the basilica westward by the addition of one bay and a narthex, the atrium was shifted to the west. Sophronius, in his Anacreontics 19 (603-4 CE), addresses it as a four-sided atrium. A corner pier and three of the columns belonging to the south side of this atrium can still be seen walled up in a room annexed to the vestibule of the Armenian monastery and in the so-called "Library of Saint Jerome” within this monastery. It extended to the western half of the present-day courtyard, and preceded by a forecourt surrounded as well by colonnades, whose western limit corresponded approximately to that of the modern road separating the courtyard from Manger Square.
This was added only in this phase. 26.8X6m in dimensions according to Ovadiah 1970.
The facade, with a gable and three entrences is still standing. This can be seen from the narthex. On the outside they were reduced in size twice, or more. The upper part was adorned, seemingly, by a wall mosaics depicting the Addoration of the Magis, mentioned in the Letter of the three patriarchs of the East to emperor Theophilus.
Those standing now are the original Justinianic walls (Bacci 2017; Alessandri 2020). They are 1 m. thick (Ovadiah 1970).
10.4 m. wide (Ovadiah 1970), is flanked by two aisles on either side, each comprising 11 columns 2.7 m. distant from each other, 44 in number altogether. The columns, monolithic, of reddish mizzi ahmar rock, stood on a raised stylobate, laid over the mosaic floors of the Constantinian church. They were crowned by normal Corinthian capitals. The architraves, of cedar wood of Lebanon, composed of three parallel beams, were engraved by floral motives and crosses on both sides and on the suffits. These were later masked by plaster. A chain for an oil lamp was hooked in a cross engraved in the center of each suffit. Dendrochronological and radiocarbon analysis revealed that they can be dated to the year 605 +- 60, i.e. between 545 and 665 CE (Bernabei/Bontadi 2012, pp. 58 –59). A shallow relieving arch, later blocked, extended from capital to capital above the architraves. The clerestory and the roof are still preserved. The wooden beams of the ceiling, carrying the roof were replaced in the 11th c. and later. Dendrochronological analyses indicate that the earliest of its beams date from a refurbishment made around 1164, and the rest of them can be traced back to the major restorations made between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries (Bernabei/Bontadi 2012, 59 – 60). The roof was of lead tiles.
The inner aisles are separated form the outer aisles by colonnades of 11 columns. Each aisle was 4.1 m. wide. A monolithic baptismal font is standing at present in the southern external aisle (see under Detailed Description, baptism).
This has 2 rows of 2 columns. Four thicker corner columns supported the dome adorning the intersection of nave and transept. The Axis of the northern and southern arms did not coincide with that of the corresponding apses.
A single column separated the transept nave from the northen aisle of each wing of the transept . There were no southern aisles. Two staircases lead down to the Grotto from the southern and northern side of these aisles. The southern one is for descending, the northern one - for ascending. The Altar of the Circumsision is located in the eastern aisle of the southern arm of the transept. An Altar of the Kings is located in the northern aisle of the transept nave.
The opening of the Well of the Star is located to the east of the northern staircase. The monolithic baptismal font located today in the souther external aisle of the basilica, might had served, originally, as the well-head (Bacci 2017).
Trifoil. Each arm ended in an apse, 8.4 m. in diameter and 4.5 m. deep. An altar of virgin is located in the northern apse.
A platform, elevated two steps above the nave and the transept, extended under the dome, and above the Nativity Cave. The bema, with the altar, extended farther east. The altar was set along the cord of the apse. A synthronon was built against the wall of the apse. Betweenn the transept and the eastern apse are several alements relating to the cave: two sets of semi circular stairs ar cut north ans south of the cave; A semi circular construction of inknown functio; and the area of the chancel. The apse contains fragments of a synthronos.The conch of the central apse seems to have been embelished by a wall mosaic depicting Mary, seated, holding Christ, mentioned by the Letter of the Three Patriarchs of the East to emperor Theophilos, and depicted also on lead ampulae.
Total | Extant in S | Extant in N |
---|---|---|
11 | 11 | 11 |
Total | Extant in N | Extant in S |
---|---|---|
11 | 11 | 11 |
Rebuilt by order of the Emperor Justinian after the Samaritans revolt.
Historical and archaeoogical considerations for dating this phase prevent determining an exact date. The data and considerations were presented recently (2017) by Bacci:
Dendrochronological and radiocarbon analysis of the wooden architraves revealed that they can be dated to the year 605 +- 60 years, i.e. between 545 and 665 CE (Bernabei and Bontadi 2012, pp. 58 –59).
This building project is mentioned only in the Arabic Chronicle of Eutychius (Ibn-Batriq), Patriarch of Alexandria (9th c.), according to which the first building was pulled down by order of Justinian, since he considered it to be too small. The event took place after a Samaritan revolt. The emperor was not satisfied from the new building presented by his envoy to the Holy Land, and ordered to behead him.
Procopius does not mention it in his "Buildings". Hence, it might had started only after the compostion of this book was completed (ca. 554-560). But it can also be conjectured that Procopius’ silence about these works may be due to the Emperor’s disappointment about the final form of the first new building.
The Samaritan revolt mentiond by Eutychius might be that of 555/56, rather than that of 529/30. It may also be that the need for new works was prompted by some damage caused by the earthquake which devastated Palestine in 551.
Cyril of Scythopolis (ref.) hints that in 557 the narthex - a new distinctive feature of the reconstructed building, already existed.
According to Bacci (2017), it should be assumed that the building campaign was initiated after Procopius had finished his book, i.e. after 560 according to most scholars, or even earlier, around 554 –555 according to an alternative hypothesis. The reconstruction works at Bethlehem could therefore have started in the last years of Justinian’s rule and have lasted beyond his death in 565.
The triconch layout is first mentioned by Sophronius, Anacreontics XIX, 23–56 (603-4 CE).
The church remained unharmed by the Persians due to the wall mosaics on its facade, depicting the Adoration of Magi. This is mentioned in the Letter of the Three Patriarchs of the East to the Byzantine emperor Theophilos (9th c.).
The Crusaders refurbished the church with wall mosaics in the clerestory and drawings on the columns.