Mar Saba; Deir Marsaba; Sabas; Great Laura - GREAT LAURA

Vertical tabs

Source of knowledge
Epigraphy
Archaeological remains
Surveyed site
Surveyors: 
NameDate
Guérin
1868-1869
conder and Kitchener
1871-1877
Corbo
1958
Meinardus
1964-1965
Patrich
1982-1983
History: 
Sabas first settled in this steep part of the Qidron valley in 478 CE, as narrated by Cyril of Scythopolis (see literary sources section). Other monks gathered around him and later founded the laura. The laura became the largest and most important and influential laura in Palestine. In spite of a certain decline after the death of Sabas, the laura continued to function as an important monastic center. In the early seventh century at the time of the Persian invasion of Palestine, the laura was attacked by Saracens. Most of the occupants fled with a few remaining who were massacred by the marauding tribe. The laura was reoccupied a short time later by some of the monks returning from their places of exile. The cells of the laura were still occupied in the first half of the eighth century attested by the report of the pilgrim Willibald, narrated by the nun Hugeburc. At a later date, the core of the monastery was surrounded by walls for security and the cells were no longer occupied. In the middle ages the monastery continued to be an important doctrinal and theological center. The monastery continues to function to the present as the Greek Orthodox monastery of Marsaba.
State of certainty: 
Archaeologically and Literarily definitive
Architectural evolution
General outline: 
The laura consisted of a core that contained churches, bakery, hospice for pilgrims, hospital and other service structures and the monks' cells that were dispersed over the cliffs on both banks of Wadi Qilt. A system of paths connected the various parts of the laura.
Dating material: 

Founded by Sabas in 483 CE based on the writings of Cyril of Scythopolis.

Phase date
Century: 
5th c.
Within century: 
Second half
General outline: 
The monastery was sacked and temporarily abandoned in 614. After the return of the monks to the site the monastery continued to function.
Phase date
Century: 
7th-8th c.
Post Arab conquest history: 
Still in use
Post conquest history comments: 
Due to security, the cells were abandoned after the Arab conquest and the monastery continued to function in the core area where defensive walls were constructed. Although sacked several more times in the Early Islamic period (notably in 797 CE), it continues to function to the present.
In continuous use