450 - Jerusalem (Mount of Olives) - Eleona

Export to text file
Save as pdf (ctrl P )

Jerusalem (Mount of Olives) - Eleona

Church Name, type, function

Site Name: 
Jerusalem (Mount of Olives)
Identification: 
The church was built over a crypt or a cave where, according to Christian tradition, Jesus taught his disciples.
Church name: 
Eleona
Functional Type: 
Memorial
Church type: 
Basilical - Annex\es on the south

Location

Coordinates, ITM system: 
223.30
631.72
Coordinates, ICS system: 
173.30
1,131.70
Geographical region: 
Jerusalem Mount of Olives
Topographical location: 
Mount of Olives
Provincial affiliation: 
Palaestina I
Bishopric: 
Jerusalem

Source of knowledge

Literary sources: 

General description

State of preservation/which parts were uncovered: 
Poorly preserved. A mono-apsidal basilica 30.5 X 19 m., in dimensions, with an atrium and a baptismal unit annexed on the south. The crypt under the raised bema is identified as the cave were Christ was teaching his disciples. 

Description

Illustrative material: 
Atrium: 

In front of the church there is a rectangular atrium with a portico in front, 19 X 3.5 m. in dimension, with six columns at its façade. Two staircases lead from north and south to a raised balcony located in front of the portico. Three entrances lead from the portico to a peristyle atrium, 25 X 19 m. in dimensions, with a water cistern at its center.

Narthex: 

No narthex.

Façade and entries: 

Three doorways lead in to the basilica from the atrium.

Lateral walls: 

Long sections of them were looted. Where laid in deep tranches.

Nave: 

11m wide. Two rows of six columns separated it from the aisles. 

Aisles: 

The width of each aisle was 4 m. Two staicases in their eastern ends led down to the crypt.

Bema, chancel screen and apse: 

According to Vincent, the apse was external, polygonal. It is 4.5 m. deep and 9 m. wide. According to Wiegand (1923) and Avi-Yonah (EAEHL), the church-head was rectangular on the outside. Likewise according to V. Michel, who suggests the existence of two rooms flanking the apse. 

Two staircases lead from the nave up to the elevated sanctuary.

Lateral spaces: 

According to the plan published by Vincent and Abel (Jm. Nouvelle, Vol. 2, p. 356, fig. 154)), the northern aisle might had been ended in a room on the east. V. Michel considered (following Wiegand 1923) the existence of two rooms flanking the apse, recognizing that at the absence of hard evidence, this cannot be determined. 

Crypt: See in the Detailed Description, crypt

Small finds

Detailed description

Structure

Orientation: 
Facing east
Materials applied (walls): 
Limestone
Materials applied (roofing): 
tiles
timber
Atrium: 
Yes
Water cistern: 
Yes
Narthex: 
No
Aisles: 
2
Colonnades / Arcades: 
Colonnade
Number of nave columns in a row: 
Total
6
East end: 
External apse, polygonal
Church Head/Chevet: 
monoapsidal with open lateral rooms or spaces (mon-aps I)
Central Apse Category: 
apsidal
Bema type: 
U shaped without lateral openings
Bema type text: 
Two staircases lead from the nave to the bema and apse.
Elevation of Bema above nave: 
more
Ambo: 
No
Apse elevation: 
Flush with the bema
Apse shape: 
Hemispherical
Synthronon: 
No

Pastophoria

Pastophoria loci: 
N & S
Description and function of northern: 
According to Wiegand (1923), the internal apse was flanked by two pastophoria, while according to the more prevalent plan by Vincent, the apse was polygonal on the outside and a pastophorium might have been existing only on the north. At the absence of clear finds, this issue cannot be determined.

Crypt

Accessibility and description: 
Under the bema there is a cave, reached by two staircases from the aisles, on both sides of the sanctuary. It is 7m long and 4.5m wide, with a semi-circular apse 3m in diameter on the east. Many fragmentary screen plates and columnets were uncovered therein. To its west there is a kokhim burial cave, typical to the Second Temple period.

Baptism

Baptism photos and plans: 
Loci: 
Attached to the church on the south. See below.
Font structure: 
Masonry built
External shape: 
rectangular
Internal shape: 
rectangular
Ben-Pechat type: 
1b

Attached structures

Baptistery: 
Simple rectangular room
Baptistery description: 
Two quadrangular rooms were annexed to the church on the south. The western one is recognized only by the borders of its mosaic floor. Seemingly it was accessed from the eastern portico of the atrium, and a second opening, in its eastern wall, connected it to the eastern room, in which a rectangular baptismal basin, 1x0.72m in dimension was preserved. The basin was surrounded by a mosaic floor. Fine stucco fragments and delicate mosaics (seemingly wall mosaics) were uncovered in it. An opening was identified in the southern wall of this room. The basin is partially rock-cut and partially masonry built. It is attributed by Vincent (1957) to the end of the 4th c. or early 5th c.

Architectural Evolution

General outlineDating materialPhase no.CenturyWithin centurySubphase A - CenturySubphase A - Within century
Eleona is a basilical, memorial church, built over a crypt or a cave where, according to Christian tradition, Jesus taught his disciples.

According to Eusebius the church was built on order of Emperor Constantine, on the initiative of his wife Helena. Also, mentioned by the Bordeaux pilgrim (333 CE).  

The baptistery annexed on the south is attributed by Vincent (1957) to the end of the 4th c. or early 5th c. This is marked here as subphase A.

Phase 1
4th c.
First half
5th c.
Early
According to Eutychius of Alexandria (Annales, 119 [text]; 99 [trans.]), the church was destroyed by the Persians in 614. However, shortly thereafter it is mentioned by Sophronius (Anacreontica XIX, 9-12), Adomnan (I, 25), Epiphanius the Monk, the Georgian Calendar and the Commemoratorium de casis Dei 1, 18 (ed. McCormick, p. 206-207). In addition, it is not mentioned among the churches restored by Modestus. Bieberstein and Bloedhorn 1994, III: 286, suggested that it was rather destroyed in a 9th c. unrest (either that of the years 809-814, or that of 871), so that in the days of Eutychius it was in ruins, as he says.

Literary sources.

Abandonment
9th c.
Post conquest history comments: 
According to Eutychius of Alexandria (Annales, 119 [text]; 99 [trans.]), the church was destroyed by the Persians in 614. But the fact that it is mentioned in several later literary sources, casts doubt about it, but in his days (d. 940), it was already in ruins.
Conclusions: 
Seemingly destroyed in the late 9th or early 10th c.